Monti: Reboot Europe through the Single Market

Monti: Reboot Europe through the Single Market

Europe’s single market was never completed and key sectors including transport are hampered by national barriers, warns EU elder statesman Mario Monti. In an exclusive interview with the European Transport Forum, Monti – a former EU Commissioner - urges policymakers to refocus...

Why Europe needs smarter transport and logistics

Why Europe needs smarter transport and logistics

By making ambitious plans for a Single European Transport Area dominated by modal shift scenarios the European Union risks losing sight of its real needs. The European debate on transport rightly takes account of issues like congestion and the environment, and listens to the view...

Participate in the ETF Transport Jam

Gathering the Best Visions on the Future of European Transport Are you a transport expert with great ideas related to the Single European Market? This is your chance to share them with the leaders of Europe! From October 3-30th*, 2011, we are inviting you to contribute with your proposals in...

EU to trucks: "pay for your pollution!"

EU to trucks: "pay for your pollution!"

A European Parliament vote has paved the way for the controversial upgraded ‘Eurovignette’ law that charges trucks for their fumes and noise, on top of tolls that can currently be levied. Lawmakers have hailed the plan as groundbreaking because it introduces the polluter-pays principle...

Can reforms overhaul Europe’s rail market?

Can reforms overhaul Europe’s rail market?

Now that European Union governments have backed new laws to open up Europe's railways to competition, will the measures achieve their aim of creating a single market for rail networks and ensuring a better service for consumers? Photo: Siim Kallas: "no other mode of transportation has s...

Poll: petrol-free economy

Will the EU meet its target of a petrol-free economy by 2050?
 

Poll: Eurovignette

Do you consider a single Eurovignette desirable?
 

Poll: RSA

Should the EU create a "Road Safety Agency"
 

Poll: Road Safety Targets

Will the EU meet its Road Safety target to reduce casualties by 50% in 2020
 

Poll: Drinking & Driving Legal Limit in EU

What should the legal limit be for drinking and driving in Europe (mg/ml)
 

Connect with ETF Community

     flickr-logo

Road
Road Safety: the medicine seems to be working PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 12 July 2011 10:00

seatbelt_250x

A big fall in road deaths suggests the European Union’s focus on safety is having an effect.


There were many who assumed that the Brussels bureaucrats behind the European Union’s road safety action plan were being woefully naïve when they first proposed a target of halving road deaths within a decade. Yet the evidence indicates that this is actually happening.

While the first EU programme missed the target, it nonetheless managed a respectable cut of 44% from 54,302 in 2001 to 2010. But a close look at the annual statistics – released by the European Commission on July 5 - shows how well it is working: between 2009 and 2010, road fatalities in the EU fell by a whopping 11%.

A second ten-year programme was launched last year, again with a target of halving road deaths. If the trend from last year continues over the coming decade, it means that the EU could actually see road deaths cut by two thirds when the programme ends in 2020.

The statistics are worth looking at in closer detail. The overall fall masks major variations amongst the member states, with the best performers last year being Luxembourg (33%), Malta (29%), Sweden (26%), and Slovakia (26%). Over the decade as a whole, the biggest falls were in Latvia (61%, from 236 deaths per million to 97), Lithuania (58%, from 202 to 90), and Spain (55%, from 135 to 54). And the lowest fatality rates overall? Sweden, at 28 deaths per million, followed by the UK at 31 deaths , the Netherlands at 32, and Malta at 36. The most dangerous roads are in the eastern parts of the EU: the highest rate last year was registered in Greece with 116 deaths per million inhabitants, followed by Romania (111) and Poland and Bulgaria (both at 102).

EU Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas welcomed the news. "It is very encouraging that nearly all Member States have managed to significantly reduce their number of road deaths, there is no room for complacency,” he said. "A hundred people still die on Europe's roads every day. We have made good progress since 2001 and we have succeeded in saving nearly 100,000 lives.”

Indeed. While it might be hard to make a direct correlation between particular measures and safer roads, logic and probability suggests that the EU can claim credit for this. While in 2001, there were 112 traffic fatalities per million inhabitants, the number had dropped to 62 in 2010.

Of course, the momentum has to be maintained if death rate is to continue falling. The EU road safety action plan for 2011-20 sets out a mix of initiatives focusing on making improvements to vehicles, infrastructure and road users' behavior. The seven strategic objectives are improved safety measures for trucks and cars, building safer roads, developing intelligent vehicles, strengthening licensing and training, better enforcement, targeting injuries, and new focus on motorcyclists.

The success of the EU’s first road safety programme has helped inspire the global scheme launched this year by the World Health Organisation: its plan for a ‘Decade of Action on Road Safety’ aims to save 5 million lives between now and 2020. Like the EU programme, the WHO addresses road safety from a number of perspectives: technologies and innovation, road infrastructure, transport networks, vehicle safety, and road user behaviour. It will involve road safety awareness events will involving public institutions to private companies and associations, with activities.

In Europe, enforcement is a key factor, and one measure that is expected to have an effect was voted through by the European Parliament on July 6: legislation which will make it harder for drivers to avoid punishment for traffic offences committed in another EU country.

The proposal would grant member states mutual access to each others’ vehicle registration data, to allow for the necessary exchange of data between the country in which the offence was committed and that in which the car was registered. The nature of offences and the penalties prescribed are not being harmonised, so the laws of the country where the offence occurred will apply. But the offences could cover speeding, failing to stop at traffic lights, failing to wear seatbelts, drink driving, driving under influence of drugs, failing to wear safety helmets, illegal use of an emergency lane, and illegal use of mobile phone while driving.

As Kallas says, there is still some way to go. Speeding, drink driving and not wearing a seat belt are the leading causes of road deaths, but policy makers also need to look at other issues, like badly maintained roads and unsafe vehicles. They need to ask why 17% of road deaths involve motorbike or moped users even though they make up just 2% of road users…

 

 
Catching up with Europe’s ticket skippers PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 20 January 2011 00:00

speeding_250x150



After years of deadlock, plans to enforce road safety offences across the European Union have been agreed by Transport Ministers. It is one of the last pieces in a Europe-wide jigsaw of road safety measures.

It is a remarkable gap in EU law, despite the internal market and half a century of integration: Europeans who speed, or burn red lights can dodge penalties if the offense occurs outside the member state where their vehicle is registered. No mechanism exists to force, say, British drivers to pay any tickets slapped on them by French police, so they mostly go unpunished once they return home. But that, at last, is about to change. On December 2, EU Transport Ministers tentatively agreed in Brussels an EU-wide system for enforcing penalties on drivers, wherever their car is registered, ending a two-year deadlock over the plans.

And the rules – in a European Commission draft directive – would urge cross-border enforcement agencies to fight four "big killers": speeding, ignoring red lights, failure to wear a seatbelt and drink-driving, the main reasons of 75% of the 35,000 deaths on EU roads every year. Member states have added five new offences to this list: driving under the influence of drugs, illegal use of the emergency lane, talking on a hand-held mobile phone while driving, violating safe stopping distances, and respect rules on the use of crash-helmets.

The proposals were first unveiled by the Commission in March 2008, and France had hoped to have the measure adopted during its EU presidency in the second half of that year. But until now there has been a deadlock on the legal base for the measures, with many member states concerned that if it was agreed as part of transport policy, it would open the door to harmonization of traffic law. Belgium, resolved the issue at the end of its EU rotating presidency by proposing that the directive should be drafted under the ‘police co-operation' section of the EU's rule-book. There are still complications, as Denmark, the UK and Ireland have opt-outs in this area, although they are expected to choose to opt in to the law.

EU Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas says foreign drivers make up around 5% of the traffic on the average road, but commit 15% of speeding offences – thus making them three times more to commit a traffic offense than a resident driver, since they could escape penalties upon returning to their home country. In countries where transit and tourism are high, like France, speeding offences committed by non-residents can reach 25% of the total number of offences and go up to 40–50% during very busy periods of the year.

The measures would give special powers to police that would allow them to prosecute the errant drivers. It would also establish a bloc-wide database – the European Vehicle and Driving License Information System - containing details of the vehicle registration.

Once the owner's name and address are known, an offence notification will be issued. It will be for the national authorities where the offence was committed to decide on the follow up for the traffic offence. The demand for payment will be written in the language of the country where the car involved is registered. If the culprit fails to pay up, then the government of the country in which they live will be obliged to take over the case, providing the fine is for €70, or more.

However, the new legislation will not standardize either the nature of the offence or the penalties, which will continue to remain with the national authorities (and parking offences are not included in the bill). And the proposal only deals with financial penalties; penalty points linked with a driving licence and withdrawing of a driving licence are not covered. Nor will the law give foreign police any tools to enforce punishments, although existing treaties and bilateral agreements may offer more scope to bring offenders to book.

And there is then a two-year period for member states to implement the legislation before it comes into force, possibly by 2013. Before that, the European Parliament needs to vote on the measures, and the Greens have already indicated that they think the proposals are too weak, with German MEP Michael Cramer noting that in Germany, the vehicle owner can still refuse to provide information about the responsible driver and thus effectively dodge punishment.

But it is, nonetheless, a key step in the EU’s efforts to make roads safer. Although the number of fatalities on the roads of the EU has fallen by 35% between 2001 and 2009, the target of halving road victims 50% by the end of 2010 has not been met. For the next decade, and the next EU road safety program, the Commission wants a further halving of road deaths. This measure will undoubtedly contribute to the figures.

As the ministers agreed the deal, Kallas hailed their significance. “Freedom of movement is a core right for Europe citizens. It must be protected. But it never included a freedom to run red lights or speed on Europe's roads,” he said. “Many people seem to think that when they go abroad the rules no longer apply to them. My message is that they do and now we are going to apply them."


 
Road safety: Lessons from across Europe PDF Print E-mail
Thursday, 25 November 2010 00:00
kallas_schouppe_250 The European Road Safety Days in Brussels revealed a wealth of ideas on how to reduce accidents. Will policy makers be able to pick the best ones?
The village was part of the European Road Safety Days, organized by the Belgian presidency and the European Commission. The aim was to promote road safety through exchanges of best practices between experts, awareness-raising measures and international conferences on strategic topics.

Participants included the Paris police outlining their traffic policy, the European Traffic Police Network (TISPOL) explaining their coordination efforts, the Belgian road safety institute (ISBR/BIVV) warning about using mobile phones while driving, the Finnish police showing how they improved their emergence response times, and the joint efforts of 15 Dutch agencies dealing with ‘Incident Management’ on motorways.

Inside the European Parliament itself, experts gathered for two days of debates. The first conference, hosted by the Commission, debated the 'Political Orientations for Road Safety 2011-20', that were unveiled by EU Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas last July. The three conference panels looked at how to deal with road injuries; special road user challenges, from cyclists and motorcyclists to drink driving; and improving road infrastructure. The second conference, hosted by the Belgian Presidency, looked at how to improve collaboration between Europe’s police and courts over road traffic offences.

This is the third time the European Road Safety Days has been held, but it comes at a crucial moment: Commissioner Kallas’s new ten-year road safety plan is due to come into effect shortly, with its ambition to halve road deaths by the end of the decade. And it comes at the end of the current ten-year EU Road Safety Action Plan, which also aimed to halve road deaths over the decade to 2010 – it failed, but came close, cutting fatalities by an estimated 44% to around 32,000.

Kallas himself said the European Road Safety Days were the perfect opportunity to take stock. “While tens of thousands die on our roads each year, incomparably more are injured,” he said. “We must also be aware of vulnerable categories of road users – such as motorcyclists, whose increasing death rate on our roads remains worrying. Progress must necessarily also include improving the road infrastructure, which must become a systematic concern of network managers.”

Belgian State Secretary for Mobility Etienne Schouppe said that although the EU is often seen as an abstract concept for many Europeans, they are very much affected by EU decisions when it comes to road safety. “Europe can do a lot for road safety,” he said. “In every member state, people know of someone who has been involved in a car accident.”

Schouppe talked of educating road users about “four killers” on European roads: excessive speeding, not wearing seatbelts, driving under the influence, and ignoring traffic lights. Belgian government statistics reveal how often police issued traffic offenses for each of these in 2009: 52,346 for drink driving; 115,862 for not wearing a seat belt ; 72,401 for burning a red light; and 2,502,806 speeding offences.

Other statistics reveal that each of these “killers” has their own dangers. Speeding is a “decisive factor” in one out of three accidents, and the death rate of rises fast: 5% at 30km/h, but 45% at 50km/h, and 85% at 65km/h. Alcohol is involved in one out of four fatal accidents, with the risk of a serious accident rising 25 time under the influence of drugs. Non-use of a seat belt raises cranial trauma risks by 40%, and death by 50%, while during a crash at 50km/h, the force of impact corresponds to 35 times the person’s weight. And failure to stop at a red light is the cause of one in three traffic accidents, and one in two accidents involving injury at crossroads.

Schouppe also used the occasion to announce plans to raise the minimum age for motorcycle licenses from 21 to 24 in Belgium. He noted that despite the overall cut in road deaths over the decade, they actually rose by 7% for motorcyclists between 2000 and 2007. “The risk of dying is 20 times more on a motorbike than in a car,” he said. "There are just too many motorcycle accidents.” (However, it earned him an immediate rebuke from the Belgian car and motorbike federation, FEBIAC, which insisted that the motorcycle exam was enough to ensure bikers were ready.)

The debates that followed revealed a wealth of different approaches, from Spain’s ‘Road Safety Strategic Plan’ and its focus on vulnerable road users and infrastructure; the ‘seven criteria’ for road safety identified by the French road studies bureau (SETRA); the experiences of ‘Brussels Mobility’, the Brussels region’s transport interface; the Dutch Ministry of Transport and Public Waterways’ policy of improving infrastructure; Austria’s rehabilitation system for drink drivers; Belgium’s Federal Planning Bureau on social costs of road accidents; and an explanation from Norway’s Institute of Transport Economics about the importance of better traffic injury data.

Now, the big question for Europe is whether policy makers will have learnt anything from their European counterparts, and if this exchange of ideas will help make roads any safer.

 

 

photo (c) EC: Etienne Schouppe, Belgian Secretary of State for Mobility, on the right, and Siim Kallas

 
Business and alcohol: How TNT enforces drink driving rules PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 25 October 2010 08:00

tnt_250

While governments work to tackle drink driving – through awareness campaigns, checks and penalty systems – key businesses have also been addressing the issue. Transport giant TNT explains its strict policies towards alcohol amongst its drivers.

Drink driving is always a dangerous proposition, and one that governments across Europe have been grappling with for many years. But they are not the only ones working to prevent over-the-limit drivers from getting behind the wheel: several businesses have added their weight to the campaigns, while developing their own measures.

Read the full article

 
The real issue: human behaviour PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 29 September 2010 00:00

motorbike_200x150

When the European Commission unveiled its proposals for a Road Safety Action Plan last July, with its new target for halving road deaths over the next ten years, it included "a new focus on motorcyclists".

However, the proposals in the draft plan show only a cursory understanding of motorcycling, according to Aline Delhaye, General Secretary of the Federation of European Motorcyclists' Associations (FEMA), the Brussels-based grouping of national European organizations.

“It has been a struggle to explain motorcycle safety,” says Delhaye. “Motorcyclists are ignored in debates on safety. It’s not on purpose. It is just easy to forget about them. Everyone is a car driver.”

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 2

Login/Register

Free Newsletter

Be informed with regular news updates



Our Partners